... | @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ increase is much lower compared to BSO and Fram; and the changes in OHT at Davis |
... | @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ increase is much lower compared to BSO and Fram; and the changes in OHT at Davis |
|
- Fig. 9: the mean March sea-ice concentration clearly decreases in the Barents and GIN Seas in the North Atlantic and northern North Atlantic experiments (top and middle rows) and this decrease is much less pronounced in the case of the BSO experiment (bottom row); furthermore, increasing the SST in the North Atlantic experiment (top row, from left to right) clearly decreases the sea-ice concentration beyond the Barents Sea (through the Kara Sea) and also in the Bering Strait, interestingly.
|
|
- Fig. 9: the mean March sea-ice concentration clearly decreases in the Barents and GIN Seas in the North Atlantic and northern North Atlantic experiments (top and middle rows) and this decrease is much less pronounced in the case of the BSO experiment (bottom row); furthermore, increasing the SST in the North Atlantic experiment (top row, from left to right) clearly decreases the sea-ice concentration beyond the Barents Sea (through the Kara Sea) and also in the Bering Strait, interestingly.
|
|
- Fig. 10: the mean March sea-ice thickness decreases everywhere in the Arctic in all experiments, especially in the North Atlantic experiments (top row); as for sea-ice concentration, increasing the SST in the North Atlantic experiment (top row, from left to right) clearly decreases the sea-ice thickness, but this sea-ice thinning clearly spans the whole Arctic.
|
|
- Fig. 10: the mean March sea-ice thickness decreases everywhere in the Arctic in all experiments, especially in the North Atlantic experiments (top row); as for sea-ice concentration, increasing the SST in the North Atlantic experiment (top row, from left to right) clearly decreases the sea-ice thickness, but this sea-ice thinning clearly spans the whole Arctic.
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|

|
|
**Fig. 1: Latitudinal transect of mean Atlantic OHT averaged over 50 years (except 2000-2014 for the CMIP6 r1 member to compare to TF2017); OHT estimates from Trenberth and Fasullo (TF2017) and hydrographic measurements (as in Grist et al., 2018) are plotted for reference; the number in brackets is the difference in mean OHT between the experiment and the control (CTRL)**
|
|
**Fig. 1: Latitudinal transect of mean Atlantic OHT averaged over 50 years (except 2000-2014 for the CMIP6 r1 member to compare to TF2017); OHT estimates from Trenberth and Fasullo (TF2017) and hydrographic measurements (as in Grist et al., 2018) are plotted for reference; the number in brackets is the difference in mean OHT between the experiment and the control (CTRL)**
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|

|
... | | ... | |