Skip to content

GitLab

  • Menu
Projects Groups Snippets
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in / Register
  • O OSeaIce
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Issues 8
    • Issues 8
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Incidents
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value stream
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Activity
  • Create a new issue
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • David Docquier
  • OSeaIce
  • Issues
  • #2
Closed
Open
Created Mar 25, 2020 by David Docquier@david.docquierOwner

Increasing the SST in the Atlantic or Pacific results in relatively similar sea-ice loss

Comparing the paired Atlantic and Pacific experiments (wide, middle and small domains) together, the sea-ice area and volume losses are relatively similar (Figs. 3-4 in the Atlantic and Pacific SST experiments), as well as the spatial patterns of sea-ice concentration and thickness (Figs. 11-13 in the Atlantic and Pacific SST experiments). In terms of spatial patterns, the March sea-ice concentration loss is concentrated at the sea-ice edges while the March sea-ice thickness loss appears everywhere in the Arctic. This suggests that the region in which the SST is increased does not really matter for the sea-ice loss.

Edited May 28, 2020 by David Docquier
Assignee
Assign to
Time tracking